command education

The market will run itself. Need something? The market will likely supply your demand.

The market just needs some regulation to make sure it's actually a market which is honest and benefits the people.

The people will run themselves. Need something? The people will likely supply your demand. The people just need some regulation make sure they're actually interacting and organising in honest ways that benefit each other.

But what if the people aren't supplying their own needs?

Like, what if they're not making enough babies, and are increasingly depressed and obese, just to name a few actual problems?

Should the government intervene?

Yes, but CrashCourse European History taught me that history has many examples of "tyranny solving the problems that tyranny has created" [check quote]>

Intelligent deregulation of people can solve people's problems, just as deregulation is related to economic growth.

So, what is there to deregulate about people? Their education.

Google AI says

"A command economy is an economic system where the government or a central authority controls all major aspects of production, distribution, and pricing. In this system, the government decides what to produce, how to produce it, and for whom, often owning the means of production and setting goals for industries. This contrasts with a free-market economy, where private enterprise and market forces primarily determine these factors"

And that there are two command economies: North Korea and Cuba.

Now imagine the same text but about education:

Command education is an education system where the government or a central authority controls all major aspects of education. In this system, the government decides what people learn, how they should learn it, and for whom, often owning the means of education and setting goals for people. This contrasts with free-market education, where private enterprise and market forces primarily determine these factors

I believe in a state education system which emulates free-market competition, where the reward function is not profit, but the life success and feedback of former attendees, and the feedback of existing attendees.

In such a system, schools are financially

incentivised to compete to produce the best outcomes for people.

For-profit and charitable organisations would be able to compete with state education, but state schools would remain state-owned.

Wikipedia:

“The content of contemporary dignity is derived from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948, summarized in the principle that every human being has the right to human dignity. In Article 1, it is stipulated that 'All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.”

Well clearly “every human being” is not, in practice, “born free and equal in dignity and in rights”, given the treatment of children as little slave learners for the government.

“Look at the government’s fashionable little slave learners with their uniforms and their timetables! This is so productive and is going to be great for society!” – thought no intelligent person ever