paraloop binary-flow-analog universe coiling theory

Because you know that the universe works by patterns, schizo thinking works because words can mean different things and you can make a principle, and assume that the principle applies elsewhere in the universe.

See the photo to understand how I came up with the below universe principle after twisting the ball, making a helix. It's the thing attached to my fleece's zip that makes it easier to pull.

Going into this theory, I already stand on the shoulders of my binary-flow-analog theory. An "analog" is like a "dimension" which is somehow made of binary and flow.

You can read my binary-flow-analog concept at the end of the Theory page of my website.

Quick refresher:

"The water cycle is the best example of binary-flow-analog

We’ve got the water cycle, and since it's a cycle, we can split it into three parts in order; binary, flow, analog.

Rain is the binary.

Then, rivers are the flow.

Then, oceans are the analog."

Heartbeat (binary), blood (flow), analog into all the capillaries, then the binary muscle contraction to analog movement of the body due to flows of pressure.

Binary-flow-analog doesn't describe a closed system, in the sense that an analog is a binary at the start of a new binary-flow-analog.

So, here is my new schizo universe principle:

"

A binary action twists a lower dimension (of two mediums) into a higher dimension. This is seen by flow.

A higher dimension is a coiling of lower dimensions.

"

Coiling is a process, and in two dimensions it can look like waves.

Mountains you could call a "higher dimension" relative to plains, and they are a coiling of two tectonic plates.

If you Google image search "coiling" you get a brain aneurysm's shape which is like a mountain.

The interesting way to apply my principle is to apply it to the unseen and the unknown.

What if the passage of time - a binary - produces a coiling of a very long metaphorical loop - which creates new dimensions?

One dimension leading to another can create something out of nothing, that you never would have guessed. 

What about gas leading to planets due to gravity?

Is that coiling?

If you go too schizo you might start calling everything coiling, like how some people call everything fascist.

So, the universe is like an "open loop", which is a paradox to begin with, and in the big bang it somehow met a moment of unsolvable tension (I wrote a paraloop big bang theory once and lost it) and so slipped into an expanding number of paraloops while also still being one paraloop.

This I wrote previously.

Now if you imagine each particle is a point (like a coiling), where does that emerge from? It emerges from the twisting of a string which is the entire string of the universe coiling into many points. And the universe started as a, let's say a string that snapped. A universe snapped, releasing all the tension into this universe which started coiling again because of the binary force which underlies time. 

You could say that when a universe snaps, it is like a string that snaps, causing the universe to unravel (uncoil) (black hole), and it unravels, growing a new universe.

Of course a single string model doesn't make sense for how the physics of that translates, but the idea is that the coiling happens not just in two dimensions obviously, as in my analogy.

A coiling is kind of like a friction or vibration. Like it is the friction of tectonic plates that makes them coil up into mountains.

In string theory, the strings vibrate. 

A vibration is a binary motion. 

But the thing is, for the universe to be unified, each vibration has to each be seperate yet also be part of the one vibration of the universe. 

And the one vibration of the universe is the one binary force. 

Grok:

"string theory is fundamentally an attempt to unify general relativity (which describes gravity on large scales) with quantum mechanics (which governs the behavior of particles on tiny scales)."

In string theory, each loop is either open or closed.

Interesting.... Sounds like Paraloop.

Really, they are neither open nor closed. 

What if the expansion of the universe is actually the creation of perceivable dimension? 

Basically, the coiling makes the lower dimension bunch up into higher dimension.

So, in classic and obligatory paradox, the universe is “expanding” because it is, in a way, contracting. 

Schizo thought:

Everything that happens in one dimension must happen in the opposite way in another, because the universe is like a machine. The nature “underneath” something is “opposed” to it.

Someone's response:

I need a little bit more to understand coiling here. Binary-Flow-Analog I can follow. The binary is, I presume, an on/off state (it's raining or it's not; your heart is contracted or relaxed), which establishes a balanced output (flow), which supports an established other "thing" (analog). 

The example of the universe as a string doesn't jive with me. I'm all for illustrations by example, but these particular symbolic maps are too separate for me to see overlay. The vibe I'm getting trying to make sense of it is like when a creationist tries to debunk evolution by saying atheists believe the earth evolved mountains. Like, I get that the creationist dislikes the concept of evolution, but the framing is so loose that I can't even disagree with their argument. 

So, I get that "coiling" is a thing you're calling attention to. Would it be the same loose process as a species adapting to its environment? Like, abundant untapped resources + competitive life forces = coiled expression of life as a product of two Binary-Flow-Analog processes [(alive/dead-reproduction-species) + (environmental flux-resource abundance-habitable opportunity)]?

This is coiling. https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxAn1TdNMYYAejyCKgurkMyYzhOjiEoZNP

The idea is that we live in and can perceive certain dimensions.

Dimensions are caused by the universe coiling.

The universe is not evenly coiled (because that's not how coiling works), causing the pattern of clusters and superclusters.

So, if the universe is one coiled cloth of matter evenly distributed by default and at the big bang, what makes some parts have galaxies and others not? The difference is which parts coiled more first.

So that's why there is a web of structures that the universe is made of.

It's like a coil except in a higher dimension.

My theory for the universe's expansion is that the less-coiled parts of the universe are in the process of coiling, producing higher dimension that affect our perception the universe.

Meaning that the universe could be perceived differently depending on what dimensions you view. 

It may only appear to be expanding, due to dimensions we live in.

The parts that are expanding are at an earlier stage in the universe, closer to the big bang.

The big bang "happened everywhere at all once". How? 

With the coil theory, it happened as soon as the first coiling happened.

I have an old philosophy that 

"under the surface human reality where things exist, things do not exist besides paradoxical loops that, although visibly 'junk' and 'meaningless' while voiding reality through the connections it makes between things, actually enables a stable and existent reality because only a 'neutral' reality can exist. For something to be neutral and also existent, it must have a neutralising 'partner' (which is really part of the one system)."

So basically something cannot exist without another. Obviously this is a basic principle. If there is only one thing then there is nothing. 

And coiling fuses two parts of the same cloth. Maybe the universe exists between the "folds".

The whole point in all the theorising is to try to come up with a logic that should describe the universe as a system that doesn't just do stuff for no reason.

Basically such that universe appears to function with some similarity to something that we can understand. 

By doing schizo thinking, you can potentially find a match. 

So this is why we talk in analogy.

I believe the universe is fractal, and therefore it has be driven by a simple principle creating complexity, and coiling really works with that.

This is still very fresh in my mind and I haven't spent 5 hours processing and checking it into a concrete and well-written theory, so that's why I called it a string although my analogy wasn't based on a string exactly, and why I may have said contradictory things. Schizo thinking can only take one so far before it's autism time.

"under the surface human reality where things exist, things do not exist besides paradoxical loops that, although visibly 'junk' and 'meaningless' while voiding reality through the connections it makes between things, actually enables a stable and existent reality because only a 'neutral' reality can exist. For something to be neutral and also existent, it must have a neutralising 'partner' (which is really part of the one system)."

sounds like matter and anti-matter as in https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxWx2_Nv1H0i5l_19FYqSfnFDBNmKniQ7E

It's like, when you philosophise hard enough, you accidentally become a theoretical physicist.